International Baccalaurette (IB) Diploma Programme (DP)

Digital Society (DS) Internal Assessment (IA)

​

Weighting and Marks

For SL students: 30% [24 marks]

For HL students: 20% [24 marks]
 

Word Count/ Duration

1,500 words

10 minutes

​

Inquiry Process Document

A: Inquiry focus [3 marks] (300 words)

B: Claims & Perspectives [6 marks] (1,200 words)
 

Multimedia Presentation

C: Analysis & Evaluation [6 marks] (6-8 min)

D: Conclusion [6 marks] (2-4 min)

E: Communication [3 marks]

​

IB Digital Society Internal Assessment Detailed Checklist

Component Overview Check 

• Inquiry Process Document (IPD) is within 1500 words total

  • Inquiry focus section ≤ 300 words

  • Claims and perspectives section ≤ 1200 words

• Presentation is within 10-minute limit

• References list is complete and properly formatted

 

Criterion A: Inquiry Focus (3 marks) | IA Excellence Checklist

• Thorough explanation of connections between all elements

• Real-world example is highly specific and relevant

• Course concepts are deeply integrated

• Context is thoroughly explored

• A compelling inquiry question that:

  • is developed by teachers and students

  • is open-ended, thought-provoking and worth considering from different perspectives

  • supports discoveries that move beyond recall, description and summary.

• Connections to course concepts, content and contexts are selected to:

  • provide insight for inquiries with conceptual perspectives

  • inform inquiries with content topics and details involving digital systems

  • situate inquiries within a course context.

• A real-world example is selected that:

  • involves a specific and existing digital system

  • may be local and/or global.

 

Criterion B: Claims and Perspectives (6 marks) | IA Excellence Checklist

• Exactly three sources identified and analyzed

• Each source is properly cited

• Each source's origin is discussed

• Each source's purpose is analyzed

• Thorough discussion of claims for each source

• Clear analysis of perspectives presented

• Explicit justification of source usefulness

• Critical evaluation of source reliability

• Links between sources are established

• Clear relevance to inquiry question

• Identify and gather sources that:

  • are grounded in the inquiry's concepts, content and contexts

  • provide a balance of claims and perspectives

  • support in-depth understanding.

• Engage with source claims and perspectives by considering:

  • the origin and purpose of each source

  • the meaning and methods of each source

  • how each source is corroborated and used.

• Reference sources to:

  • demonstrate awareness of the existing conversation and debate about an issue

  • acknowledge ideas, work and intellectual content of others

  • help others locate sources for future use.

​

Criterion C: Analysis and Evaluation (6 marks) | IA Excellence Checklist

• Initial analysis is clearly presented

• Supporting evidence is provided

• Impact on people is analyzed

• Impact on communities is evaluated

• Analysis is sustained throughout

• Multiple pieces of supporting evidence

• Clear development of initial ideas

• Effective use of examples

• Strong connections to digital systems

• Implications are thoroughly explored

• All these questions addressed:

  • How does the context and conceptual perspective inform and shape the investigation of impacts and implications?

  • What are positive and negative impacts for different people and communities?

  • Which impacts are intentional and which impacts are unintentional?

  • What is the timescale associated with investigated impacts and implications?

  • What are possible ethical, policy, legal and/or governance implications?

  • How does the context and conceptual perspective inform and shape the investigation of people and communities?

  • Who are the people and communities directly and/or indirectly affected?

  • What are the different claims made by people and communities?

  • What are the roles performed by people and communities?

  • What are the responsibilities and relationships of people and communities?

​

​

Criterion D: Conclusion (6 marks) | IA Excellence Checklist

• New understanding is demonstrated

• Original insights are presented

• Emerging trends are identified

• Future developments are discussed

• Insights are well-supported with evidence

• Clear progression from initial inquiry

• Emerging trends are substantiated

• Future developments are critically analyzed

• Conclusions flow logically from analysis

• Links back to inquiry question are clear

• At the close of inquiry, reflect to:

  • offer further insight including new understanding and ideas

  • consider emerging trends and future developments related to the inquiry.

​

Criterion E: Communication (3 marks) | IA Excellence Checklist

• Clear structure is evident

• Ideas flow logically

• Evidence is well-organized

• Transitions are smooth

• Media supports understanding

• Various media types are used effectively

• Transitions enhance presentation

• Audio/visual elements are purposeful

• Effects support rather than distract

• Media is coherent with content

• Presentation is well-organized throughout

• Media usage is consistently effective

• All elements support understanding

• Professional presentation style

• Clear and engaging delivery

• Communicate inquiry discoveries effectively by:

  • considering the purpose and audience as well as appropriate and available formats.

  • conveying ideas and evidence with organization and a coherent use of media.

​

Final Technical Checks

• Word count is clearly stated

• The presentation time is clearly marked

• All citations are properly formatted

• Bibliography is complete

• Tools used in the presentation are listed

• Audio-visual sources are credited